Skip to main content

Any kind of response to this change!

Feature Request

Aside from all the negative changes with features removed and an incomplete v3 being pushed on everyone, how about an actual sincere acknowledgement from the developers that they hear our feedback, they are actively working to improve, they understand your frustration, maybe they had a misstep, SOMETHING. Passively directing us to this suggestions page after so many people have expressed discontent feels disrespectful and tone deaf, especially after hiking the subscription price in recent years. Refusing to directly face the criticism only fans the flames more.

Posted by mipr5770 ·
Status: Rejected1 comment

Log in to comment and vote

Comments1

  • Kevin Cador changed status to Rejected
    Team•

    Jul 29

    Pinned

    Thanks for sharing this. We understand that the transition to v3 has been frustrating for some users, and we’ve acknowledged that feedback in several places.

    This roadmap is not a passive redirect: we actively review requests, consolidate duplicates, follow the upvotes, and use those signals to prioritize improvements. Many of the changes already shipped or in progress came directly from feedback submitted here.

    If a workflow you rely on is missing and isn’t already represented, please create a focused request describing the exact page or behavior you need. That gives others something clear to upvote and allows us to prioritize it alongside the other requests.

    Since this post doesn’t describe a specific, trackable product change, I’m closing it.